Royal Dutch Shell Group .com

ShellNews.net: ROYAL DUTCH SHELL ABYSMAL TRACK RECORD IN PROCEEDINGS WITH THE OWNERS OF ShellNews.net: Alfred and John Donovan: Saturday 13 August 2005: 13.15 ET: (Updated 11 Sept 05)

 

ROYAL DUTCH SHELL ABYSMAL TRACK RECORD IN PROCEEDINGS WITH THE OWNERS OF ShellNews.net: ALFRED DONOVAN AND JOHN DONOVAN

 

By John Donovan

 

The following is an accurate list of the various proceedings between Shell and the owners of ShellNews.net, Alfred Donovan and John Donovan, commencing just over a decade ago, with the most recent proceedings being decided on a unanimous verdict against Shell International Petroleum Company Limited on 8 August 2005. 

 

1. High Court proceedings brought against Shell in respect of “Shell Make Money” promotion, alleging breach of confidence and breach of contract: Outcome: Settled out of court by Shell for £60,000 ($108,000 US approx)

 

2. County Court proceedings against Shell alleging Shell had acted in breach of the terms of a mediation agreement designed to avoid further litigation: Outcome: Settled by Shell in exchange for a financial package worth £125,000 ($225.000 approx) which also covered item 3 below and other matters.

 

3. High Court proceedings against Shell alleging defamation after Shell accused the Donovan’s of making “bogus” claims against Shell: Outcome: Settled by Shell in exchange for the above financial package worth £125.000 ($225.000 approx).

 

4. High Court proceedings brought against Shell in respect of Nintendo Gameboy promotion, alleging breach of confidence and breach of contract: Outcome: Settled out of court by Shell for £100,000 ($180,000 US approx) plus legal costs. This was one of the alleged “bogus” claims.

 

5. High Court proceedings against Shell in respect of “Now Showing” promotion, alleging breach of confidence and breach of contract: Outcome: Settled out of court by Shell for £100,000 ($180,000 US approx) plus legal costs. This was the other alleged “bogus” claim. Claims 4 and 5 were settled together for a total of £200,000 ($360,000) plus costs.

 

6. The Nintendo and "Now Showing" settlements resulted from mediation carried out by CEDR - a London based mediation service. In a written submission to the CEDR mediators (two senior independent lawyers) Shell conceded that “DM had a perfectly valid claim” in respect of the Make Money concept. At the commencement of the mediation, Shell Legal Director, Richard Wiseman, grandly announced that he had been asked to apologise to us on behalf of Shell UK’s board of directors for the way we had been treated. After the mediators had interviewed witnesses at length, the senior mediator, Mr Nicholas Prior, said that he and his colleague (Jane Andrewartha) had reached the conclusion that “Mr Lazenby had pissed on Don Marketing from a very great height” - a memorable phrase. Shell Manager, Andrew Lazenby, was at the heart of all of our claims against Shell. We subsequently also received an unsolicited letter of apology from Dr Chris Fay, the then Chairman and CEO of Shell UK Limited. The fact that official apologies were made verbally and by letter confirmed that Shell’s outrageous allegations that claims 3 and 4 were “bogus”, were manifestly false. Outcome: Nintendo and "Now Showing" claims settled in our favour.

 

7. High Court proceedings against Shell for libel after Shell had issued a press release, displayed posters at The Shell Centre in London and circulated a letter, all of which contained defamatory comments. Outcome: Settled out of court as part of the SMART settlement below.

 

8. High Court proceedings against Shell in respect of Shell SMART – a multi-partner loyalty card scheme: Shell brought Counterclaims: Outcome: “Joint" Press Release issued announcing a “Stalemate” outcome. In fact Shell paid ALL legal costs (over £1,000,000 ($1,800,000 US). John Donovan also received a secret payment. This was negotiated under duress after the pre-trial process had been tarnished by undercover activity (admitted in writing by Shell), witness intimidation and a series of highly suspicious burglaries, including the home of a lawyer acting for John Donovan and at the residence of his key witness.

 

9. Proceedings brought by Shell against Alfred Donovan via the World Intellectual Property Organisation alleging that he obtained registration of the domain names royaldutchshellplc.com; royaldutchshellgroup.com and tellshell.org in bad faith: Shell sought to have the domain names transferred to their ownership: Outcome: Unanimous verdict against Shell by three person independent panel. Alfred Donovan retains ownership of all three domain names even though the domain name royaldutchshellplc.com is precisely the same name as ROYAL DUTCH SHELL PLC – the $200 BILLION unified company resulting from the reserves scandal. The WIPO verdict speaks volumes for the independence and integrity of the that august organization and the three person panel of notable experts. 

 

Alfred Donovan had NO legal representation in the SMART trial (nor in the WIPO proceedings). Shell had an army of in-house lawyers and sleazy external lawyers (Kendall Freeman) for the SMART trial, plus undercover agents and unlimited financial resources. The compromise settlement covered up a conspiracy of deliberate deception practised by Shell managers in a tender process for a major contract. Documents providing incontrovertible proof of the wrongdoing were made known to Shell senior management. Despite this, Shell management ignored an invitation to withdraw its support for the dishonest mastermind behind the deception - the Shell National Promotions manager, Andrew Lazenby, identified above.

 

SCORE TO DATE: SHELL HAS NOT WON A SINGLE CASE

                   

COST TO SHELL: IN TERMS OF MONEY: MILLIONS: IN TERMS OF DAMAGE TO SHELL'S REPUTATION DUE TO MANAGEMENT MISJUDGEMENT AND INCOMPETENCE: IMPOSSIBLE TO QUANTIFY (THE SAME MANAGEMENT RESPONSIBLE FOR THE RESERVES SCANDAL)                

 

Panel Decision Notification by the World Intellectual Property Organisation (Eight page document)

 

Further WIPO notification (two page document)

 

Fair Use Notice: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml.If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. Site Ownership: Shell 2004.com (also known as ShellNews.net) IS OWNED AND OPERATED BY THE SHELL SHAREHOLDERS ORGANISATION: CHAIRMAN ALFRED E DONOVAN, 847a Second Avenue, New York City, NY 10017, USA. The statements expressed here, and any opinions, are those of the writers alone, and neither are opinions of nor reflect the views of Shell2004.com. Content created by the writers is the sole responsibility of the writers and its accuracy and completeness are not endorsed or guaranteed. This goes for all links, too: Shell2004.com has no control over the information you access via such links, does not endorse that information, cannot guarantee the accuracy of the information provided or any analysis based thereon, and shall not be responsible for it or for the consequences of your use of that information. 

 © 2004/5 Shell2004.com All rights reserved.

 

Click here for ShellNews.net HOME PAGE


Click here to return to Royal Dutch Shell Group .com