Royal Dutch Shell Group .com

OPENING ADDRESS BY JEROEN VAN DER VEER, CHAIRMAN, COMMITTEE OF MANAGING DIRECTORS, ROYAL DUTCH SHELL GROUP AT SHELL BUSINESS WEEK 2004, HELD IN HOUSTON, TEXAS: 26 MAY 2004

 

(The speech has been retyped for security reasons)

 

26 MAY 2004

 

PLEASE NOTE THIS IS INTENDED FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY

 

WE ARE GOING THROUGH A VERY DIFFICULT TIME IN THE HISTORY OF SHELL

 

WE ARE A STRONG COMPANY BUT SOME SERIOUS MISTAKES WERE MADE.

 

I REALISE THIS MAY HAVE SHAKEN YOUR TRUST AND CONFIDENCE IN YOUR LEADERS

 

I AM VERY SORRY ABOUT THIS

 

OUR INTEGRITY IS QUESTIONED BOTH INTERNALLY AND EXTERNALLY

 

I MYSELF FEEL SHOCKED DISMAYED AND ASHAMED AT WHAT HAS HAPPENED AND I IMAGINE YOU MUST FEEL THE SAME

 

I HOPE WE CAN ALL LEARN FROM THIS AND TOGETHER TAKE SHELL OUR COMPANY FORWARD

 

AS LEADERS WE HAVE A RESPONSIBILITY TO LEAVE HERE TODAY WITH A CLEAR VISION OF OUR WAY FORWARD

 

SO WE NEED STRAIGHT TALKING CLEAR THINKING AND HUMILITY

 

WE HAVE MORE PROBLEMS THAN JUST THE RESERVES ISSUE

 

WE WILL SPEND SOME TIME TODAY ON WHAT HAS HAPPENED AND ON OUR STRATEGY ON CONCRETE STEPS FORWARD AS WELL AS ON OUR BEHAVIOURS

 

THIS IS A SPEECH FOR ALL OF US…

FOR YOU - FOR THE CMD - INCLUDING MYSELF

 

THIS SPEECH IS NOT TO COMFORT US

 

IT IS TO EXPRESS MY OPINIONS ABOUT OUR STRATEGY

 

WHO WE ARE AND QUESTIONS ABOUT THAT

 

MY WAY FORWARD TO A BETTER SHELL

 

OUR STRATEGY

 

OUR STRATEGY IS SIMPLE

 

MORE UPSTREAM AND PROFITABLE DOWNSTREAM

 

WE BALANCED OUR GLOBAL BUSINESS WITH CONTINUED LOCAL STRONG DELIVERY

 

WE WILL TALK ABOUT STRATEGY LATER.

 

BUT WE ARE WHERE WE ARE PARTLY BECAUSE WE FOCUSSED ON A LOW OIL PRICE AFTER 1998 BUT MUCH MORE BECAUSE OF EXECUTION PROBLEMS IN ALL OUR BUSINESSES

 

I KNOW THAT ALL BUSINESSES HAVE ASPECTS WHERE WE ARE STILL WORLDS BEST BUT THERE ARE TOO MANY AREAS WHERE WE ARE NO BETTER THAN AVERAGE

 

IN THE UP-STREAM IN THE NEXT 3 TO 4 YEARS WE MUST BUILD THE FOUNDATIONS FOR STRONG FUTURE GROWTH BY PROLONGING OUR HEARTLANDS BY STEPPING UP EXPLORATION SPEND AND SUCCESS AND BY INVESTING HEAVILY TO BUILD NEW HEARTLANDS ESPECIALLY BASED ON GAS – AND BY REBUILDING OUR SKILLS

 

IN THE DOWNSTREAM IN THE NEXT FEW YEARS WE WILL RATIONALISE THE PORTFOLIO – WE WILL GLOBALISE AND STANDARDISE

 

WE MUST RAISE OUR OPERATIONAL GAME

 

GROW IN CHINA AND INDIA AND FOCUS EVER MORE ON THE CUSTOMER

 

FOR GOOD ORDER DOWNSTREAM IS OIL PRODUCTS AND CHEMICALS

 

WHO ARE WE?

 

OUR PEOPLE ARE THE KEY

 

I BELIEVE OUR EMPLOYEES ARE AS GOOD OR BETTER THAN THOSE OF THE COMPETITION

 

HOWEVER I WONDER

 

HAS EXCESSIVE JOB MOVEMENT CREATED TOO MANY GIFTED AMATEURS IN A WORLD THAT NEEDS MORE PROFESSIONALISM – COMMITMENT TO PERFORMANCE AND DISCIPLINE

 

THE RESERVES ISSUE WAS NOT CAUSED BY OUR SCORE CARD OR BONUS SYSTEM

 

NEVERTHELESS WE NEED TO CONSIDER WHETHER OUR SCORE CARDS AND PAY SYSTEM DO DRIVE BEHAVIOURS

 

SCORE CARDS AND BONUSES WERE DESIGNED TO FOCUS THE ENERGY OF OUR PEOPLE

 

OUR REMUNERATION PER SENIOR LEADER HAS GONE UP SUBSTANTIALLY OVER THE PAST YEARS.

 

HAS IT BROUGHT BETTER PERFORMANCE OR A BETTER CULTURE TO SHELL

 

I DO WANT ALL OF OUR LEADERS TO BE COMPLETELY REWARDED BUT I ALSO WANT TO ENSURE WE HAVE A REMUNERATION STRUCTURE THAT BINDS COHESION LOYALTY AND COMMITMENT TO THE LONG TERM GOOD OF THE COMPANY

 

OVER THE PAST MONTHS ALL OF US HAVE BEEN IN SITUATIONS IN WHICH WE HAD TO DEFEND OUR ENTERPRISE

 

BUT IF I LOOK OVER THE PAST YEARS I WONDER HAS THE BALANCE BETWEEN ENTERPRISE FIRST AND SELF FIRST MOVED TOO MUCH TO SELF FIRST

 

AMBITION IS GOOD BUT AMBITION WITH DISREGARD FOR PEERS OR SUBORDINATES CREATES THE WRONG CULTURE

 

DO WE UNDERSTAND THE WORD HUMILITY

 

DO WE THINK THAT THE OUTSIDE WORLD IS WRONG TO LABEL US ARROGANT SLOW AND INWARD LOOKING

 

DO WE FIX OUR PROBLEMS BY MAKING A PLAN FULL OF OVERSTRETCH OR UNATTAINABLE TARGETS

 

WE HAVE HAD THE RESERVES ISSUE

 

MANY DOWNSTREAM ASSETS DO NOT HAVE FIRST QUARTILE PERFORMANCE BUT DO WE KID OURSELVES THAT WE ARE FIRST QUARTILE PEOPLE

 

AND HOW DO WE KNOW THAT THE NEXT LARGE PROJECT PROPOSAL DOES NOT HAVE TOO OPTIMISTIC ECONOMIC ASSUMPTIONS

 

AND IF WE THINK ABOUT COSTS DO WE DO IT AS WE DO AT HOME

 

SO DO WE REALLY SPEND THE COMPANIES’ MONEY AS IF IT WERE OUR OWN

 

AND DO WE HAVE TOO MANY INTERNAL MEETINGS AND TRAVELLING FOR THAT

 

THINK ABOUT YOUR LAST 10 JOURNEYS

 

WHAT PERCENTAGE WAS FOR CUSTOMERS OR TRAVELLING OR NGOS

 

I BET THAT MOST WERE FOR INTERNAL MEETINGS TALKING TO OURSELVES

 

OUR WAY FORWARD

 

I BELIEVE WE NEED A STEP CHANGE IN OUR BEHAVIOURS AND WE NEED TO DEVELOP IT HERE AND MAKE IT TOGETHER

 

IN DOING SO WE SHOULD BE MINDFUL OF THE LESSONS OF THE TRANSFORMATION WE EMBARKED ON IN THE MID 90S

 

THIS ACHIEVED SOME GOOD CHANGES

 

ROACE

COSTS

GLOBAL PROCESSES AND BEST PRACTICES

 

WE KNOW OUR VALUES OF HONESTY INTEGRITY AND RESPECT FOR PEOPLE BUT DID THE MID 90S TRANSFORMATION BRING THE DESIRABLE BEHAVIOURS

 

OR DID IT ERODE PROFESSIONALISM CORPORATE COHESION ENTERPRISE FIRST THINKING AND LOYALTY

 

THE STEP CHANGE IN BEHAVIOURS SHOULD CONNECT DIRECTLY WITH OUR VALUES

 

SO LET ME GIVE MY THOUGHTS ON OUR WAY FORWARD FOR SHELL

 

IT RESTS ON 4 LEGS

 

1

OUR BUSINESS PRINCIPLES OR CODE OF CONDUCT – I EMPHASISE TODAY OUR VALUES HONESTY INTEGRITY RESPECT FOR PEOPLE

 

2

LAT

LEADERSHIP ACCOUNTABILITY AND TEAMWORK

I WILL COME BACK TO THAT

 

3

DIVERSITY AND INCLUSIVENESS

 

4

SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT WHICH GUIDES HOW WE DO OUR OPERATIONS AND PROJECTS

 

I USED THE LABEL LAT

IT STANDS FOR LEADERSHIP ACCOUNTABILITY AND TEAMWORK

 

WHAT DO I MEAN BY THOSE WORDS

 

1

LEADERSHIP

*WE STANDARDISE SIMPLY AND GLOBALISE OUR OPERATIONS AND PROCESSES

WE ARGUE FOR SAMENESS RATHER THAN DIFFERENCE

 

*WE LENGTHEN OUR JOB TENURES THAT MAKE OUR PERFORMANCE MORE PROFESSIONAL AND DISCIPLINED

 

*WE HAVE CLEAR AND FOCUSED PRIORITIES

 

*WE WILL INCLUDE THE DESIRED BEHAVIOURS IN THE WAY WE SELECT AND APPRAISE PEOPLE

 

*WE WILL MODIFY OUR SCORE CARDS AND REMUNERATION PLANS TO DRIVE PREFERRED BEHAVIOURS

 

* NO NEW GURUS…   WE WILL DO IT OURSELVES AND LEAD BY EXAMPLE

 

2.

ACCOUNTABILITY

 

*WE HAVE ACHIEVABLE TARGETS SO NO OVERSTRETCH NOR COMPLACENCY

 

*WE MAKE SURE THAT WE COMPLY WITH INTERNAL AND EXTERNAL STANDARDS AND WITH THOSE OF REGULATORS

 

*WE RETHINK INTERNAL TALKING AND TRAVELLING

*WE REWARD SUCCESS WE ADDRESS FAILURES IN PERFORMANCE AND WE DO NOT TOLERATE MISBEHAVIOUR

 

3

TEAMWORK

 

*WE HAVE THE SAME GOOD PEOPLE

ENTERPRISE FIRST IS BETTER THAN SELF FIRST

 

*WE HELP OTHERS ON THE TEAM BUT WE ALSO CHALLENGE THEM WITH NO BULLYING

 

*WE CAN HANDLE BAD NEWS BUT WE GIVE IT EARLY

 

*NO OPTIONALITY THAT BEHAVIOURS IN UPSTREAM ARE DIFFERENT FROM DOWNSTREAM…   WE LIVE APART TOGETHER

 

YOU HAVE HEARD ME USING THE WORDS PROFESSIONALISM AND DISCIPLINE

 

LET ME EXPAND ON DISCIPLINE

 

IF WE HAVE MORE DISCIPLINE WE NEED LESS HIERARCHY LESS BUREAUCRACY

 

WE WILL LOWER COSTS AND WE WILL HAVE A BETTER COMPANY CLIMATE

 

IS THAT NOT WHAT WE ALL WANT

 

WHAT ARE MY KEY PARAMETERS TO MONITOR OUR WAY FORWARD…

 

I WOULD USE

 

1

FIRST QUARTILE COMPARISONS WITH THE COMPETITION ABOUT OPERATIONAL EXCELLENCE

PROJECT DELIVERY

UNIT COSTS

RETURN ON CAPITAL

CASH AND REPUTATION

 

2

TOTAL SHAREHOLDER RETURN – TRS

 

3

THE PEOPLE SURVEY AND THE ATMOSPHERE DURING MEETINGS LIKE TODAYS

ABOUT HONESTY

INTEGRITY

RESPECT FOR PEOPLE

 

FINALLY WHAT IS THE REWARD WHEN WE ACHIEVE THIS STEP CHANGE IN OUR COMPANY BEHAVIOURS

 

THE PRIZE IS THAT WE BECOME A WORLD WIDE PROFESSIONAL NETWORK WITH DISCIPLINE THAT PERFORMS IN A FIRST QUARTILE WAY IN ALL ASPECTS

 

THIS MEANS WE ARE ALL FIRST QUARTILE AND IT FEELS GREAT TO BE PART OF IT

 

SO THE CHANGE IS FROM WHERE WE ARE NOW TO BEING FIRST QUARTILE WITH THE RIGHT BEHAVIOURS

 

THAT WILL BE THE BASIS ON WHICH WE TOGETHER CAN REBUILD SHELLS REPUTATION AND PERFORMANCE

 

AND THIS MEETING IS A KEY STEP IN DOING JUST THAT

 

I BELIEVE IT WILL TAKE TIME BUT TOGETHER WE CAN DO IT 

 

SPEECH ENDS:

 

It is relevant to note that during a speech in September 2002, Shell accountant Anton Barendregt informed an oil conference in Norway that the the 'objectivity' of oil and gas reserves estimates at the company would be "endangered" if linked to executive performance. The following Shell internal emails from Shell whistleblower Dr John Huong to his then colleagues suggests that those fears were well founded. Dr Huong was seeking confirmation of an accusation launched against him by his Team leader for the for the "destruction of team work within the Kinabalu Project". His emails contained comments relevant to the issues of withholding information and misdeeds from the Company and the high secrecy associated with the introduction of variable pay linked to executive "performance". The incentive was so lucrative that it amounted to an encouragement for employees to lie for the company so as to preserve the apparent good scorecard values.
 
 
From:     JOHN J.Y.T HUONG / EPS-POS, OPENMAIL
To:          DAYANG-NORPIAH D.N.Abg-Suhaili / EPB-HRL, OPENMAIL, LOCAL; 
               EMMANUEL E.Ogagarue / EPS-PON, OPENMAIL; GERARD
               G.Bloch /EPS-KNS, OPENMAIL; JANNY J.Spilsbury / EPS-POB,
               OPENMAIL; JOSELYN Tham / EPS-KNS, OPENMAIL, LOCAL; KAM- 
               SING K.S.CHOOI / EPS-KNS, OPENMAIL; KIA-SENG K.S.Chang / EPS-
               KNS, OPENMAIL; TONY J.LAKE / EPS-KNS, OPENMAIL
Subject: Clarification
Sent:      22 October 1997 08:48
 
Dear ex-colleagues,
 
Good morning,
 
In the recent staff appraisal of mine with Han he said that I have "seriously affected team performance".  A full recording to this matter goes like this "That was my observation.  The team members had conveyed that they were equally affected severely".  I then asked who the team members were and Han replied that he "cannot give you names" and I respected that confidentiality.  Then he added it refer to "most team members". This is a very serious matter and I seek your cooperation by giving me feedback as to how that has affected your performance.  It does not need to be long; bullet points will do.  Due to the grave implications on this matter, do reply because most of you have told Han that the team performance were severlely sffected.
 
John
 
........................................................................................................................
 
EXHIBIT B
From:     JOHN J.Y.T HUONG / EPS-POS, OPENMAIL
To:          DAYANG-NORPIAH D.N.Abg-Suhaili / EPB-HRL, OPENMAIL, LOCAL; 
               EMMANUEL E.Ogagarue / EPS-PON, OPENMAIL; GERARD
               G.Bloch /EPS-PON, OPENMAIL; JANNY J.Spilsbury / EPS-POB,
               OPENMAIL; JOSELYN Tham / EPS-PON, OPENMAIL, LOCAL; KAM- 
               SING K.S.CHOOI / EPS-PON, OPENMAIL; KIA-SENG K.S.Chang / EPS-
               PON, OPENMAIL; TONY J.LAKE / EPS-PON, OPENMAIL
Subject: RE: Clarification 2
Sent:      19 November 1997 15:24
 
Dear ex-colleagues,
 
Good afternoon,
 
My e-mail to you dated 22nd October found no response except for one.  I urge you again to think this serious matter over and in doing you may provide me with a written reply.
 
I heard one of you said to me personally that you disagree.  This is very good but please do provide me with a written reply as to what the specifics and the incidents were.  Another have said "I'm sure you knoe how and I get along", My reply to that was " I believe in sincerity and in truth in my dealings with people.  The feedbacks from what Han had said obviously demonstrate that there were many things going behind me without my knowledge.  For ease of understanding please do say what good and/or not good that I have done as your teammate.  In this way the carification will shed light on Han's statement.
 
Thank you.
 
John
.........................................................................................................................
 
From:     JOHN J.Y.T [JOHN j.Y.T.HUONG / EPS-POS, OPENMAIL]
Sent:      16 December 1997 15:14
To:          DAYANG-NORPIAH D.N.Abg-Suhaili / EPB-HRL, OPENMAIL, LOCAL; 
               EMMANUEL E.Ogagarue / EPS-PON, OPENMAIL; GERARD
               G.Bloch /EPS-PON, OPENMAIL; JANNY J.Spilsbury / EPS-POB,
               OPENMAIL; JOSELYN Tham / EPS-PON, OPENMAIL, LOCAL; KAM- 
               SING K.S.CHOOI / EPS-PON, OPENMAIL; KIA-SENG K.S.Chang / EPS-
               PON, OPENMAIL; TONY J.LAKE / EPS-PON, OPENMAIL
Cc:         CAMPBELL C.A. KEIR / EPS, OPENMAIL
Subject: Destruction of team work within the Kinabalu Project
 
Ex-colleagues,
 
I have written to you two e-mails (EXHIBIT A,B) and up to today I have got only  one reply.  I have explained clearly to you as to why I really need that information.  Can you all please make an effort because I understand Tony and Gerald are also going to leave the area soon?  You are truly men and women of honour when you can communicate truthfully what had actually transpired with regard to what had affected and destroyed the spirit of team working within the Kinabalu project which Han and most of you had claimed.
 
While I was still in the Kinabalu Subsurface team, I have actually highlighted a few areas (EXHIBIT C) where proper homework was not done for a multi-billion dollar project. I have raised my concerns as a faithful employee by taking initiatives to call for meeting with agenda, proposed solutions and made recommendations as early as March.  No real fruitful outcome had materialized from such engagement until we almost run out of NOPs to drill the wells around August.  The concern to deliver then was so intense for getting my job done that I was perceived as the single cause of lowering the performance of the entire team within the Kinabalu Project.  This perception and among other poor reasons had caused me to be transferred out of the Kinabalu Project.
 
For example,  I had asked a number of times in the subsurface team meeting between March and May for a simulation work made for the Kinabalu Main to be shown to the team for which Han had promise.  That had never taken place until intense pressure from me in August to see the simulator.  WHen the simulation work was finally shown it was discovered that the "L2 reservoir in the ECLIPSE simulator was found to be some 50 feet shallower.  Further more the wells were unfortunately simulated outside the current interpreted fault." At that team meeting Han realized the seriousness of the error compounded by the delay to which he said, "let us not talk about this because it will affect our variable pay".  Can you tell me honestly if our working relationship is affected because I was pushing too hard for proper homework to be made?  As far as I am concern we owe the company a duty of care and I am not going to give a dime about any colleague whose individual agenda supersede that of the corporate objectives.
 
Could you please reply me as soon as possible and of course I cannot direct you what to do because I do not have such power.  However, if I do not receive from you any reply and when situation demands me to present those factual matters then I am afraid that I will have to ask Campbell to instruct you to comply with my request.
 
John

 

Click here to return to ShellNews.net HOME PAGE


Click here to return to Royal Dutch Shell Group .com