New Straits Times (Malaysia): 'Ex-Shell employees' suit within time frame': “On Sept 20, 2004, the High Court in Miri ruled in favour of the ex-employees and said the retirement benefit under the Retirement Benefit Fund was ultra vires the Act. Sarawak Shell Berhad and Sabah Shell Petroleum Company Ltd filed an appeal.”: Tuesday 18 October 2005
PUTRAJAYA, Mon. - The Court of Appeal today ruled that it has the jurisdiction to decide whether former employees of Sabah and Sarawak Shell had filed their civil action within six years.
A total of 398 ex-employees had sought a court ruling on whether their employers' decision to deduct their contributions before paying out retirement benefits to them was against the Employees Provident Fund Act.
On Sept 20, 2004, the High Court in Miri ruled in favour of the ex-employees and said the retirement benefit under the Retirement Benefit Fund was ultra vires the Act.
Sarawak Shell Berhad and Sabah Shell Petroleum Company Ltd filed an appeal.
Also appealing are seven individuals who are trustees of Shell Sarawak and Sabah Retirement Benefit Fund and Shell Sarawak and Sabah Provident Fund. The ex-employees, represented by Datuk Cyrus V. Das, today raised a preliminary objection before the Court of Appeal proceeded to hear the appeal proper. They claimed the companies should have raised the limitation issue before the trial judge.
(Any party intending to take action against another has to do so within a stipulated period, in this case, six years.) However, Datuk Cecil Abraham, who is assisting Queens' Counsel Robert Ham, replied that the companies were not raising a new point of law at the appeal stage. He said the issue was in their pleadings.
Court of Appeal judge Datuk Abdul Aziz Mohamad, who dismissed the preliminary objection by the ex-employees, said the appellate court could hear the limitation issue along with other grounds of appeal. Sitting with him were Datuk Mohd Ghazali Mohd Yusoff and Datin Paduka Zaleha Zahari. Their decision was unanimous.
The 398 claimed the companies made contributions to the retirement benefit fund as well as the EPF but when it came to repayments, they deducted their contributions to the EPF before paying the workers.
Hearing continues.
RELATED ARCHIVE ARTICLES
Click here to return to ShellNews.net HOME PAGE